top of page

Photogrammetry vs LiDAR: Key Differences, Accuracy & Use Cases

As industries rely more on accurate three-dimensional (3D) spatial information, there are two methods of reality capture dominating the landscape: LiDAR (light detection and ranging) and photogrammetry. Both methods can produce accurate three-dimensional models (3D), digital twin models, topographic maps, and geospatial information, but methods differ significantly in acquisition techniques, level of accuracy, cost, processing workflows, and intended use.


If you work in any of the following fields – surveying, engineering, construction, mining, geographic information systems (GIS), forestry, or managing infrastructure – it is important that you understand the differences between photogrammetry and LiDAR, so you can select the right technology for your needs.


Photogrammetry vs LiDAR
Photogrammetry vs LiDAR

What Is Photogrammetry?


Photogrammetry is a method to take measurements in 3D space at a surface using 2D photos taken from different angles to form an image of the surface from photographic information taken from 100s or 1000s of photos.


By using the latest in computer vision algorithms, photogrammetry software can identify matching points throughout the images to build a complete 3D model, point cloud, orthomosaic, or DEM of the surface.


Photogrammetry Processes typically have the Following Steps:


  1. Image acquisition will be conducted via drones, planes, satellites, or ground-based cameras.

  2. Images will be aligned and features matched with each photograph.

  3. Structure from Motion (SfM) will be used to estimate where the camera was located while taking the photos.

  4. A dense point cloud will be built.

  5. A Mesh and Texture will be built.

  6. An Orthophoto and Terrain Model (DTM or DEM) will be created.


Below Are Common Methods Of Acquiring Photogrammetric Data:



What Is LiDAR?


Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) is a remote sensing technology where laser pulses are emitted to the surrounding area to measure the distance from the sensor. To achieve an accurate three-dimensional coordinate representation of the area, the system emits many thousands, or even millions, of laser pulses per second and calculates the amount of time it takes for the laser pulse to return to the LiDAR sensor.


A LiDAR system is made up of four main components:


  • Laser Scanner

  • Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Receiver

  • Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)

  • Data Processing Software


The LiDAR process involves the following steps:


  1. Emission of a laser pulse

  2. Reflection off a surface

  3. Measuring Time-of-Flight

  4. Computing Coordinates

  5. Creating a Point Cloud


LiDAR technology differs from photogrammetry technology since LiDAR measures the distance directly rather than using images to infer geometry.


Some examples of the platforms in which LiDAR systems can be used include:


  • Drone LiDAR systems

  • Airborne LiDAR systems

  • Mobile mapping systems

  • Terrestrial laser scanners

  • Autonomous vehicles


Photogrammetry vs LiDAR: Key Differences, Accuracy & Use Cases

Photogrammetry vs LiDAR: Quick Comparison

Feature

Photogrammetry

LiDAR

Data Source

Photographs

Laser pulses

Sensor Type

Passive

Active

Day/Night Operation

Daylight dependent

Works day and night

Vegetation Penetration

Limited

Excellent

Surface Color Capture

High-quality textures

Limited

Accuracy

High

Very high

Cost

Lower

Higher

Processing Time

Longer image processing

Faster geometry extraction

Ground Detection

Challenging in dense vegetation

Excellent

Equipment Complexity

Moderate

Advanced


Accuracy Comparison: Photogrammetry vs LiDAR


Photogrammetry Accuracy


Drone photogrammetry can typically deliver the following accuracy levels:


Horizontal 1-3 cm Vertical 2-5 cm Ground-Sampling Distance - Sub-centimeter achievable.


Accuracy is impacted by:


Quality of cameras, altitude of flying, amount of overlap between images, number of Ground Control Points, lighting conditions, and algorithms used for processing.


Photogrammetry's Limitations


Photogrammetry's accuracy decreases when capturing:


Uniform-textured surfaces, reflective-water surfaces, reflective-material surfaces, dense-vegetation areas, and low-texture areas without any identifiable surface features.


LiDAR Accuracy


LiDAR provides common accuracy levels of:


Horizontal 1-5 cm Vertical 1-3 cm Point Density – Typically are achieved at millions of points per second.


LiDAR Accuracy Is Determined By:


Quality of scanner, calibration of Inertial Measurement Unit, quality of GNSS, speed of flight, altitude of scan, and the degree to which scan angle changes.


Benefits of LiDAR for Improved Accuracy


LiDAR excels when:


Mapping dense-vegetation areas, mapping utility corridors, extracting terrain from above, and finding the surface of the earth with respect to the vegetation that was above it.


When attempting to create bare-earth terrain models, LiDAR typically creates more accurate models than photogrammetry.


Best Use Cases for Photogrammetry


Photogrammetry provides an excellent alternative when high levels of visual detail are required.


Construction Progress Monitoring


Using high-resolution imagery allows you to do the following:


  • Document Sites

  • Track Progress

  • Report to Stakeholders


Architecture / Heritage Preservation


Best Suited for:


  • Historic Building Documentation

  • Facade Modeling

  • Digitalization of Cultural Heritage


Real Estate Marketing


Creates Realistic:


  • 3D property tours

  • Digital Twins

  • Marketing Visualizations


Mining Stockpile Measurement


Provides Accurate Volume Calculation at Low Cost


Agriculture


Supports:


  • Crop Health Monitoring

  • Vegetation Analysis

  • Precision Agriculture Initiatives


Best Use Cases for LiDAR


Opt for LiDAR where geometric precision and viewability of the ground/surface terrain are a priority.


Topographic Mapping


Use LiDAR for highly accurate maps of challenging terrain.


Forest Management


Uses LiDAR for:


  • Measurement of tree height

  • Estimation of biomass

  • Tree canopy analysis


Mapping Utility Corridors


LiDAR used for:


  • Electric power lines

  • Pipelines

  • Transportation systems


Infrastructure Engineering


LiDAR used for:


  • Roads

  • Railroads

  • Bridges

  • Tunnels


Floodplain and Watershed Modelling


LiDAR is used to provide accurate bare earth surface (topographic) elevation for subsurface hydraulic flow modelling.


Autonomous Vehicle Navigation


LiDAR helps with:


  • Object detection

  • Navigation

  • Updating map data in real-time


Choosing Between Photogrammetry and LiDAR


Ultimately, the decision will come down to your project's objectives.


Use Photogrammetry when:


  • You're on a tight budget.

  • Aesthetics are the most important (visual quality).

  • You have an open and unobstructed site to work with.

  • You require high-resolution photographic images.


Use LiDAR when:


  • You need the highest accuracy possible.

  • Your site has dense vegetation.

  • You require terrain modeling.

  • You want to create an infrastructure map.

  • You want to operate in different lighting conditions.


Use Both When:


  • Creating Digital Twins

  • Large Infrastructure Projects

  • BIM Support

  • Smart City Planning.


Future Trends in Reality Capture


Improvements in sensor technology are helping close the gap between LiDAR and photogrammetry.


Some emerging technologies driving this change forward include:


  • Point cloud processing with Artificial Intelligence

  • Mobile LiDAR utilizing SLAM methodology.

  • Hybrid sensors mounted on UAVs

  • 3D reconstruction in real-time

  • Automated extraction of features

  • Cloud-based analytics for geospatial information


As the costs of these technologies decline and computing power continues to improve, hybrid reality capture solutions are becoming the main method of choice for complex measurement and design projects.


While photogrammetry and LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) are both types of capture technology that measure reality, they have different capabilities and applications.


Photogrammetry is generally stronger for creating photo-realistic models and is an affordable way to collect data, while LiDAR has greater geometric accuracy, the ability to penetrate vegetation, and capabilities to map terrain more accurately.


Photogrammetry typically works well for projects where visual representation is important (for example, a presentation), and LiDAR typically works well for projects that require high accuracy (e.g., terrain analysis, mapping infrastructure, and surface models in heavily vegetated areas). More frequently, organizations are combining the two technologies to provide a complete and highly accurate digital twin of a site or structure that can be used across multiple professions (i.e., surveying, construction, GIS, and asset management).


By knowing the strengths and weaknesses of each technology, professionals can make better choices when planning and executing a project and achieve the best possible results, both in terms of profitability and return on investment of geospatial data collection.


For more information or any questions regarding Photogrammetry and LiDAR, please don't hesitate to contact us at


USA (HQ): (720) 702–4849

India: 98260-76466 - Pradeep Shrivastava

Canada: (519) 590 9999

Mexico: 55 5941 3755

UK & Spain: +44 12358 56710


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page